The Brass Ring of AppSec: Is AI Finally Making DAST to SAST Correlation Possible?
2026.02.03-Snyk-LandingPage-1540x660

Sponsored By:

logo-vertical-black-removebg-preview
Tuesday, February 3rd

11 am ET

Since the dawn of application security a quarter-century ago, the discipline has been defined by the combination of two necessary but insufficient approaches to finding and fixing vulnerabilities in software: static analysis (SAST) and dynamic analysis (DAST). Almost every AppSec organization must employ some version of both tactics, as they can each help to mitigate the other’s well-known drawbacks.

Yet, the persistent challenge in application security since its inception has been the inability to automatically correlate results between tools in each category, resulting in a high degree of manual triage, inefficiency, and coverage gaps. Attempts to resolve the correlation problem through highly opinionated technologies like IAST have consistently faced high barriers to adoption, especially in technically diverse environments.

But this perennial headache of AppSec professionals may finally have a cure on the way. Recent advances in AI and machine learning, combined with the availability of new data streams such as eBPF, have opened a new window of opportunity for innovation in the field of DAST/SAST correlation, and a new race is underway to finally solve application security’s trickiest problem once and for all.

Key Takeaways:

Join Snyk, the leader in Developer Security and AI Trust, for a discussion of:

- Why do most organizations require both DAST and SAST tools rather than standardizing on one or the other?

- What have been the traditional barriers to correlating vulnerability results between the two technologies, and why does this drive inefficiency and coverage gaps within AppSec programs?

- How is the developer experience (DevEx) negatively affected by the lack of DAST to SAST correlation?

- Why have historical attempts to solve this problem largely been unsuccessful?

- What new technologies and techniques have prompted renewed pursuits of DAST/SAST correlation among security vendors, and is there hope on the horizon?

- What opportunities will trustworthy, automated vulnerability correlation unlock for the future of application security practice?

Register Below:

We'll send you an email confirmation and calendar invite 

Clinton-modified

Clinton Herget

Field CTO - Snyk
I spent about two decades building software for a living, and now I talk about building software for a living. The latter is *much* easier.

In my role as Field CTO at Snyk, I talk to cybersecurity leaders, practitioners, and developers about the evolution of application security and the critical role we play as software builders in understanding, mitigating, and remediating the organizational risk inherent to what we build.

I spent my previous lives as a web developer, DevOps engineer, cloud solutions architect, engineering team manager, technical director, and consultant with two decades of experience building and supporting complex cloud-based web and mobile applications. As an engineer, I thrive in problem-solving, rapid prototyping, and communicating about technical complexity.

Always a passionate advocate for contemporary SDLC methodologies like microservices, behavior-driven development, jobs-to-be-done, and everything-as-code, regardless of how close my hands are to the literal and proverbial (and always mechanical) keyboard. But still can't resist a late night of playing with Docker, Kubernetes, Jenkins, Terraform, Bash and Python.